| Newsletter
Highlight :
By Dr. Gabriel Leung, University of Hong Kong
The
HKEA Newsletter 2002, 6(2), p.5.
HOW
WELL DOES IT WORK? BREAST CANCER SCREENING
|
|
Objectives.
To systematically review the evidence for population-based mammography
as applied to a Chinese population.
Methods.
Primary reports for the meta-analysis were identified by a search
of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. Information on breast cancer
incidence and mortality was collected from the International Agency
for Research on Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Registry. Outcome
measures included breast cancer-related mortality, the number needed
to screen (NNS) to prevent one death, and the positive
predictive value (PPV) of mammography.
|
|
Results.
The pooled relative risk for breast cancer-related death in the
screened group was 0.80 (95% confidence interval = 0.71, 0.90).
When applied to Hong Kong this translates into an NNS of 1,302 healthy
women screened annually for 10 years to prevent one death. The PPV
of mammography was between 1.8% and 13.4%. Therefore, for 100,000
Hong Kong Chinese women aged 50 or over screened annually
for 10 years we would expect 8,980 false positive cases, 134 of
them would sustain a biopsy-related complication. Only 77 breast
cancer-related deaths would be avoided, assuming trial conditions
and 100% uptake and follow-up.
Conclusions.
There is insufficient evidence to justify population-based breast
cancer screening by mammography for women in Hong Kong and other
Asian populations with low breast cancer prevalence.
|
|